Legal Project Management Plan & Checklist
Purpose of this Guide: Use this plan when a client wants to divide relationship property after separating from a spouse, civil union partner, or de facto partner in New Zealand. This plan helps family law practitioners guide the applicant through the entire legal process of dividing assets, debts, the family home, and chattels. It covers the initial advice and verification of relationship details, mandatory financial disclosure, alternative dispute resolution, filing court applications, executing service, and completing post-settlement transfers.
Jurisdiction: Family Court of New Zealand. Relationship property disputes are resolved under the national jurisdiction of the Family Court, with appeals going to the High Court of New Zealand.
The Process at a Glance: The process starts with client onboarding, conflict checks, and verifying the date of separation to calculate critical statutory deadlines. Spouses or partners then exchange comprehensive financial disclosures in good faith to compile the joint asset pool. If negotiations fail to produce a certified separation agreement, the applicant files an initiating document package in the Family Court and executes personal service on the respondent. Counsel attend judicial case management conferences, conduct interlocutory discovery if assets are hidden, and participate in a judicial settlement conference. If a settlement is not reached, the matter proceeds to a substantive trial for a final judge-led division.
Use this plan when a client seeks division of relationship property after a de facto relationship of short duration (less than three years) in New Zealand. This guide assists the practitioner in assessing whether the client qualifies for property division under the restrictive statutory gateway of section 14A, preparing the evidentiary record, drafting claims, and filing applications to prevent serious injustice.
Use this plan when a client in New Zealand wants to challenge and set aside an existing separation or contracting-out agreement. This guide assists family law practitioners in auditing section 21F formal requirements, compiling evidence of procedural unfairness, non-disclosure, or unforeseen changes, and filing applications to set aside agreements under the section 21J serious injustice threshold.
Use this plan when a client wants to file a relationship property claim in New Zealand after the statutory limitation period has expired. This guide helps family law practitioners navigate the interlocutory process of applying for court leave under section 24(2) of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (NZ), detailing how to prove delay reasons, establish lack of prejudice, and demonstrate serious injustice.
Key Legislation and Case Law: Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (NZ) - s 1N (guiding principles), s 2D (de facto relationship factors), s 2G (valuation date), s 8 (relationship property scope), s 9 (separate property), s 9A (separate property value increases), s 10 (intermingling rules), s 11 (presumption of equal sharing of the family home, chattels, and relationship property), s 13 (exceptions to equal sharing), s 14 (short duration marriages), s 14A (short duration de facto relationships), s 15 (court's power to award compensation for economic disparity), s 21 (contracting out and separation agreements), s 21F (formal validation requirements), s 21J (serious injustice set-aside power), s 24 (limitation periods), s 44 (transfers to defeat claims), s 44C (transfers to trusts). Family Court Rules 2002 - Rule 392 and Rule 398 (Form PR1 assets affidavit requirement). Key cases: [Harrison v Harrison [2005] 2 NZLR 349](https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/) on process unfairness and serious injustice; [Tracey v Tracey [2016] NZHC 3960](https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/) on unforeseen circumstances and deteriorated health; [White v Kay [2017] NZHC](https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/) on unfairness from inception; [Clark v Sims [2016] NZFLR](https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/) on unreasonableness at agreement execution; [Gosbee v Gosbee [1999] NZFLR](https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/) on economic disparity apportionment. NZ Legislation database: Property (Relationships) Act 1976. Ministry of Justice: Family Court Property Division.
* Disclaimer: We're nobody's lawyer, because we aren't lawyers. You are, so you know better than to take legal advice from an app. We also aren't accountants or dog trainers - just digital spirit guides taking zero liability for any of this. This site exists to gather the collective knowledge of practitioners like you. Verify everything and submit your feedback on the Relationship Property Division (Applicant) matter plan to improve the playbook. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, it's a request for input.
This legal matter plan provides a structured workflow for Family Law cases, outlining the standard Litigation process. Utilize these tracking templates to manage your legal cases efficiently.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Got a question about this plan?
Ask in the practitioner Discord - edge cases, rule changes, and jurisdiction-specific nuances, all in one place.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
Draft and dispatch formal correspondence addressing the procedural requirements at this stage, including any required notices, requests for information, or proposals for resolution.
Limitation periods are governed strictly by section 24 of the Property (Relationships) Act 1976 (NZ). Filing after this window requires leave under section 24(2), proving that delay explanation is sound, there is no prejudice to the respondent, and refusing leave causes hardship/serious injustice to the applicant or to a child of the relationship.
Coordinate the collection and review of all financial documentation required for disclosure, including statements, valuations, and supporting schedules as mandated by the rules.
Early duty of disclosure is a core requirement under Rule 392 and Rule 398 of the Family Court Rules 2002. A failure to provide complete disclosure is grounds for setting aside a private settlement agreement on the basis of serious injustice under section 21J.
Conduct a thorough review of all filed materials to ensure compliance with court requirements, verify service obligations have been met, and prepare for the next procedural milestone.
Assess the strategic considerations for interim applications, prepare supporting evidence, and draft the necessary documentation for urgent or time-sensitive relief sought.
Under section 44 (transfers to defeat relationship property claims) or section 44C (transfers to trusts having the effect of defeating claims), the court can award compensation if trust transfers reduced the applicant's share. Under the Trusts Act 2019, trustees must proactively disclose basic trust information to beneficiaries.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
Form PR1 is mandatory under Rule 392 and Rule 398 of the Family Court Rules 2002. All assets and liabilities must be identified, valued, and classified.
Draft and dispatch formal correspondence addressing the procedural requirements at this stage, including any required notices, requests for information, or proposals for resolution.