Legal Project Management Plan & Checklist
How to defend a possession of property obtained by crime charge in Ontario under sections 354 and 355 of the Criminal Code.
What is the penalty for possession of stolen property?: Possession of stolen property valued over $5,000 carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment. For property $5,000 or under, the maximum is 2 years. These are hybrid offences prosecuted in the Ontario Court of Justice or Superior Court of Justice.
Does a conviction affect immigration status?: Yes. Because possession over $5,000 carries a 10-year maximum penalty, a conviction constitutes serious criminality under section 36(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), resulting in inadmissibility and deportation risk for Permanent Residents, even if no jail time is served.
Jurisdiction: Ontario Court of Justice (OCJ) and Superior Court of Justice (SCJ).
The Process at a Glance: The matter begins with an initial appearance in case management court where a Designation of Counsel may be filed. Defence counsel reviews Stinchcombe disclosure to verify the stolen origin of the property, possession, and guilty knowledge. A Judicial Pre-Trial (JPT) is conducted. If the matter is not diverted via the Direct Accountability Program (DAP) or resolved by plea, it proceeds to trial or a section 11(b) Charter delay application. Post-disposition, a section 490 application may be required for the return of seized property.
How to defend a possession of property obtained by crime charge under $5,000 in Ontario using diversion programs or summary conviction under section 355(b).
How to defend a possession of property obtained by crime charge exceeding $5,000 in Ontario under section 355(a) of the Criminal Code.
Key Legislation and Case Law: The offence is governed by the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, specifically sections 354 (possession), 355 (punishment), and 358 (completion of possession). Charter rights under section 11(b) are interpreted per R. v. Jordan [2016] 1 SCR 631. Seized property return is governed by section 490.
* Disclaimer: We're nobody's lawyer, because we aren't lawyers. You are, so you know better than to take legal advice from an app. We also aren't accountants or dog trainers - just digital spirit guides taking zero liability for any of this. This site exists to gather the collective knowledge of practitioners like you. Verify everything and submit your feedback on the Criminal Law: Possession of Stolen Property Defence matter plan to improve the playbook. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, it's a request for input.
This legal matter plan provides a structured workflow for Criminal Law cases, outlining the standard Litigation process. Utilize these tracking templates to manage your legal cases efficiently.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
Draft and dispatch formal correspondence addressing the procedural requirements at this stage, including any required notices, requests for information, or proposals for resolution.
Coordinate the collection and review of all financial documentation required for disclosure, including statements, valuations, and supporting schedules as mandated by the rules.
Assess the strategic considerations for interim applications, prepare supporting evidence, and draft the necessary documentation for urgent or time-sensitive relief sought.
Crown disclosure obligations are absolute and continuous per R. v. Stinchcombe [1991] 3 SCR 326.
Got a question about this plan?
Ask in the practitioner Discord - edge cases, rule changes, and jurisdiction-specific nuances, all in one place.
Conduct a thorough review of all filed materials to ensure compliance with court requirements, verify service obligations have been met, and prepare for the next procedural milestone.
Verify all prerequisite documentation has been obtained, cross-reference against the statutory requirements for this matter type, and confirm compliance with practice direction protocols.
Prepare the relevant forms and supporting materials required under the applicable legislation, ensuring all mandatory fields are completed and all attachments are properly certified.
The doctrine of recent possession permits an inference of guilty knowledge if the accused is found in possession of recently stolen property without a credible explanation. The threshold for 'recent' depends on the nature of the property (R. v. Kowlyk [1988] 2 SCR 59).